Appointment to Toxify Infants | Physicians Accused of Poisoning Babies, Brainwashed, Acting benevolently, yet Deadly Consequences

Appointment to Toxify Infants | Physicians Accused of Poisoning Babies, Brainwashed, Acting benevolently, yet Deadly Consequences

In recent discussions, the Well-Baby visit and the vaccinations administered during these routine pediatric appointments have been the subject of intense debate. The author, known for their critical and accusatory perspective on the medical field, has been amplifying the work of Marcella Piper-Terry, a voice that questions the standard vaccination practices.

This controversy, as depicted in articles from dailynewsfromaolf.substack.com, unbekoming.substack.com, and fivememefriday.substack.com, primarily revolves around concerns about vaccine hesitancy, safety, and the recommended vaccination schedules. Critics question the necessity of certain vaccines at such a young age, express concerns about multiple shots in one visit, and highlight safety fears fueled by past controversies and misinformation.

One of the key points of contention is the rising trend of parents refusing or delaying vaccines for their infants and young children, as reported by the CDC. This trend, accompanied by an increase in exemptions for kindergarten vaccines in many states, directly impacts public health by increasing susceptibility to outbreaks of preventable diseases.

The discredited claim linking the MMR vaccine to autism, known as the Lancet MMR fraud, continues to cast a shadow over vaccine safety, despite strong scientific evidence disproving such links. Some parents remain wary of vaccinating their infants at well-child visits due to these concerns.

The well-baby visit, referred to by the author as "Come-In-To-Get-Your-Baby-Poisoned" and "Sacrifice-Your-Baby", has been the subject of intense scrutiny. The author questions the ethics of these visits, implying potential harm to babies, and finds the language used in the medical field regarding babies' health to be vile doublespeak.

The author's writing style, reminiscent of Dr. Robert Mendelsohn's approach, encourages readers to comment on the article to gain additional truth. The author enjoys discussing the role of doctors and finds it unusual that discussions about the medical field often exclude the role of pediatricians. The author perceives pediatricians as brainwashed, well-intentioned, and lethal "poisoners".

Medical experts stress the importance of vaccinations at well-baby visits to prevent disease outbreaks and protect community health. Skipped or delayed vaccines increase risks for serious infections like measles or RSV, which can be severe in infants. This conflict is embedded in larger societal debates intensified by misinformation and recent increases in vaccine exemptions among children.

The author encourages readers to approach these discussions with a critical eye, questioning the recommendations and practices that are presented as standard. As always, it is crucial to stay informed and make decisions based on factual evidence rather than unfounded fears or misinformation.

[1] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Vaccine Exemptions by State. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/conversations/docs/vaccine-exemptions-by-state.pdf

[2] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Vaccine Hesitancy. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/vac-hes.htm

[3] American Academy of Pediatrics. (2021). Immunization Schedules. Retrieved from https://www.aap.org/en-us/advocacy-and-policy/aap-health-initiatives/Pages/Immunization-Schedules.aspx

[4] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Measles. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/measles/index.html

[5] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in Children. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/rsv/children/index.html

1. The matter of vaccine hesitancy, safety, and recommended vaccination schedules has become a central issue in current debates.
2. Critics challenge the necessity of certain vaccines being administered at such a young age.
3. Concerns about multiple injections in one visit persist among parents, raising questions about potential side effects.
4. The safety of vaccines is a point of apprehension for some parents, due to past controversies and misinformation.
5. The increasing trend of parents refusing or delaying vaccines for their infants and young children has serious implications for public health.
6. These practices lead to increased susceptibility to outbreaks of preventable diseases.
7. The Lancet MMR fraud, discredited claim linking the MMR vaccine to autism, still casts a shadow over vaccine safety.
8. Many parents continue to be wary of vaccinating their infants due to such worries.
9. The well-baby visit, criticized by the author, has been labeled as "Come-In-To-Get-Your-Baby-Poisoned" and "Sacrifice-Your-Baby".
10. The author questions the ethics of these visits, suggesting potential harm to babies.
11. The author's accusatory tone towards the medical field calls the language used in the medical community regarding infant health into question.
12. The author's writing style mirrors that of Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, encouraging readers to comment on the article for additional truth.
13. The author is curious about the role of doctors in discussions about the medical field, finding it odd that pediatricians are often absent from such dialogues.
14. The author perceives pediatricians as brainwashed, well-intentioned, yet potentially lethal "poisoners".
15. Medical experts emphasize the importance of vaccinations during well-baby visits to prevent disease outbreaks and protect community health.
16. Skipped or delayed vaccines increase the risks of serious infections such as measles or RSV, especially for infants.
17. This ongoing conflict is deeply embedded in larger societal debates intensified by misinformation and recent increases in vaccine exemptions among children.
18. The author suggests readers to approach discussions with a critical mindset, questioning recommendations and practices that are presented as standard.
19. It is crucial for individuals to stay informed and base decisions on factual evidence rather than unfounded fears or misinformation.
20. According to a report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), vaccine exemptions by state can be found at this link.
21. The CDC also provides information on vaccine hesitancy on their website.
22. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) offers immunization schedules on their website.
23. The CDC offers resources on measles at their website.
24. Additionally, the CDC provides information on Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) in children on their website.
25. In the realm of environmental science, climate change can have significant impacts on various health and wellness aspects.
26. Workplace-wellness programs play a crucial role in addressing mental health issues, encouraging fitness and exercise, and managing chronic diseases.
27. When it comes to mens' health, discussions on medical conditions, such as prostate cancer, and autoimmune disorders cannot be neglected.
28. Conversations on women's health, skin care, and therapies and treatments for conditions like hormonal imbalances and polycystic ovarian syndrome are equally important.

Read also: