Skip to content

Court reclaims 6,000 square meters of property in Vladivostok

Land parcel of approximately 6,000 square meters in the Promіragulnaya bay region was reclaimed by the Vladivostok Municipal Property Management Department following a court ruling. The lessee had developed a parking facility on the property, which was originally intended for specialized parks,...

Court Restores 6,000 Square Meters of Property in Vladivostok
Court Restores 6,000 Square Meters of Property in Vladivostok

Court reclaims 6,000 square meters of property in Vladivostok

In two separate cases, the Arbitration Court of Primorye has ruled against entrepreneurs who have been using land for purposes other than their intended ones.

The first case involves a 6,000 sq.m. plot of land in the Promezhutochnaya Bay area, which was leased to LLC "Dalvostokstroy" in 2015. According to the court's ruling, the land was designated for use as "specialized parks, gardens, dendrariums, and greenhouses." However, an inspection by the Municipal Property Management Department found that the land was not being used for its intended purpose, but instead was being used for parking.

Despite receiving warnings, the tenant failed to address the identified violations. A follow-up inspection by the department's specialists found that the violations had not been addressed. The court's ruling orders the entrepreneur to vacate the seized plots of land within 5 days of the ruling's enforcement and hand them over to the city.

The second case took place on Russky Island, where a person associated with a legal ruling was forced to transfer a 6,000 square meter piece of land near the TEC-2 landfill site managed by the Vladivostok city administration within 5 days. The land, instead of being used for its intended purpose, was illegally used for the construction of a recreation base.

The Ministry of Defense of Russia filed the lawsuit in this case, as the land in question was not being used for its intended purpose. The court's ruling also orders the entrepreneur to vacate the seized plots of land and hand them over to the city.

In both cases, the land was not being used for its intended purpose, leading to legal action and the seizure of the plots by the court. The rulings serve as a reminder to entrepreneurs to comply with the terms of their leases and to use land for its intended purposes.

Read also:

Latest