Skip to content

Discussion Unfolds on Necessities for Trump's USD1 Stablecoin to Overcome EU's MiCA Regulation Controls

Stablecoin USD1 encounters hurdles related to transparency, reserve backing, and volume limits seeking entry into the European market via MiCA, due to concerns about regulatory compliance.

Discussion Unfolds on Necessities for Trump's USD1 Stablecoin to Overcome EU's MiCA Regulation Controls

New and Improved:

In the wake of its grand debut, World Liberty Financial's stablecoin, USD1, has stirred quite the buzz in the crypto world. With a rapid ascent in market capitalization and impressive investor interest, it's no wonder folks are keeping a close eye on this digital dime. But to truly expand USD1's reach, particularly in Europe, it's essential to tackle the hefty compliance list set out by the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation.

In a recent BeInCrypto interview, experts from Foresight Ventures, Kaiko, and Brickken shared their insights. They emphasized the importance of having substantial European bank reserves, operational volume caps that protect the euro, and transparent information about USD1 to ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest.

USD1's Globetrotting Ambitions

Launched by the decentralized finance (DeFi) project closely associated with the Trump family just a month ago, USD1 aims to establish the greenback's domination worldwide. Accidental fortune cookie message? We think not - with a market cap of $128 million and a 24-hour trading volume of nearly $41.6 million, USD1 is proving to be quite the successful venture. The project has even released 100% of its total supply of 127,971,165 tokens.

For USD1 to truly establish dollar dominance and stand out from the competition, it needs to act fast and efficiently. Key competitors, Tether (USDT) and Circle's USD Coin (USDC), currently hold a significant market share advantage and established currencies, such as the euro, pose a challenge. Market access and differentiation are key to achieving this goal.

MiCA's stringent demands

The European Union (EU), the world's first jurisdiction to establish a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets across its 27 member states, has confirmed its commitment to compliance with MiCA's detailed and clear requirements. "MiCA's main requirements for stablecoins are full reserve backing with liquid assets, strict reporting and transparency rules, a cap of 1 million daily transactions for non-EU currency stablecoins, and a significant part of reserves must be held in EU-regulated banks," Dessislava Ianeva-Aubert, Senior Research Analyst at Kaiko, shared in the BeInCrypto interview.

If USD1 wants to operate in the EU's 31 million user crypto market, it must ensure it meets every demand. Failure to do so could lead to regulatory hurdles and compromised credibility among institutional users.

USD1 under the microscope

US senators have raised concerns about President Trump's involvement in USD1 since its announcement. Three days after the announcement, a group of lawmakers led by Senator Elizabeth Warren sent a letter to the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Their concern? Letting a president personally benefit from a digital currency overseen by federal agencies he has sway over poses a significant risk to the financial system.

As things stand, USD1 may need to work through potential conflicts of interest to maintain credibility and navigate MiCA's strict reporting and transparency rules.

Impacts on MiCA Acquisition

According to Ianeva-Aubert, clearing up doubts over potential conflicts of interest would affect USD1's ability to apply for an operating license in the European Union. MiCA requires strong governance, including independent directors and clear separation between owners and managers. Issuers must also have clear rules to handle conflicts of interest. If USD1 has any conflicts, this could make it harder to comply.

Ianeva-Aubert also pointed out that WLF has yet to release enough public information on USD1 to assess its compliance effectively. Particularly, the stablecoin issuer has not disclosed measures it would take to safeguard against market manipulation.

As the situation stands, USD1 would likely fail MiCA's transparency tests. However, there are other parts of the framework that might present even larger obstacles for USD1 to operate across the European Union.

The tough EU reserve mandate

When discussing the biggest regulatory hurdles USD1 would face in securing a MiCA license, experts' responses were unanimous. The stablecoin would need to store a large portion of its reserves in a European bank, which has proven difficult for established stablecoin issuers seeking operations across the region.

If USD1 wants to work in places where it can experience uninhibited growth, the European market might not be the best fit for this stablecoin. Other parts of MiCA also suggest this could be the case.

MiCA's transaction volume caps

As part of the MiCA regulation, the European Union has taken specific measures to protect the euro's dominance within Europe. To contain the possibility of a digital currency not denominated in euros becoming widely adopted for daily payments within Europe, MiCA places volume caps on transactions used as a means of exchange.

If a digital currency not denominated in euros were to become extensively adopted for daily payments within Europe, it could present a potential risk to the European Union's financial sovereignty and the stability of the euro.

Specifically, USD1 issuers must suspend any further digital currency issuance and provide a remediation plan to the relevant regulator, outlining steps to ensure their usage does not negatively impact the euro.

If USD1 wants to work where it can experience uninhibited growth, the European market might not be the best fit for this stablecoin.

MiCA's limitations to stablecoins as investment vehicles

EU regulators have been clear that stablecoins, or e-money tokens (EMTs), as the regulation refers to them, are payment instruments that should not be confused with investment vehicles. The MiCA framework has a few rules in place to prevent this.

"MiCA prohibits EMTs from offering any form of interest or benefit to holders based on the duration of their holdings. This restriction reinforces the classification of EMTs as payment instruments, not investment vehicles, and limits their use in structured products, yield-generating services, or decentralized finance platforms unless those platforms are also regulated under EU law," Fabrega shared.

These limitations and the volume caps may make Europe an undesirable target for USD1.

Should WLF consider the EU market for USD1 operations?

While the European Union has an undeniable crypto market presence, other jurisdictions have a larger footprint. Projects ultimately determine their growth strategy. Given the circumstances, experts think WLF might want to focus on regions with less stringent stablecoin regulations to drive its adoption.

The EU's crypto market remains comparatively small, with just 31 million users, compared to Asia's 263 million and North America's 38 million users. This limited market size may not justify MiCA compliance costs for projects like WLFI.

Regardless of the markets WLF evaluates in its efforts to increase the reach of USD1, compliance with general stipulations concerning transparency, legal architecture, and real-time transaction oversight could be conducive to its eventual success.

  1. The European Union's commitment to compliance with MiCA's detailed requirements is a significant challenge for World Liberty Financial's stablecoin, USD1.
  2. Experts have emphasized the importance of having substantial European bank reserves, operational volume caps, and transparent information about USD1 to ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest.
  3. The rapidly rising market cap and impressive investor interest in USD1 have stirred buzz in the crypto world, but it needs to act fast and efficiently to establish dollar dominance.
  4. The project's competitors, Tether (USDT) and Circle's USD Coin (USDC), currently hold a significant market share advantage, and established currencies like the euro pose a challenge.
  5. MiCA's main requirements for stablecoins are full reserve backing with liquid assets, strict reporting and transparency rules, a cap of 1 million daily transactions for non-EU currency stablecoins, and a significant part of reserves must be held in EU-regulated banks.
  6. Failure to meet these demands could lead to regulatory hurdles and compromised credibility among institutional users for USD1.
  7. US senators have raised concerns about President Trump's involvement in USD1 since its announcement, with some lawmakers worried about potential conflicts of interest.
  8. WLF has yet to release enough public information on USD1 to assess its compliance effectively, particularly regarding measures to safeguard against market manipulation.
  9. The stablecoin would need to store a large portion of its reserves in a European bank, which has proven difficult for established stablecoin issuers seeking operations across the region.
  10. The European Union has placed volume caps on transactions used as a means of exchange to contain the possibility of a digital currency not denominated in euros becoming widely adopted for daily payments.
  11. MiCA prohibits EMTs from offering any form of interest or benefit to holders based on the duration of their holdings, reinforcing the classification of EMTs as payment instruments, not investment vehicles.
  12. Experts think WLF might want to focus on regions with less stringent stablecoin regulations to drive the adoption of USD1, given the circumstances.
  13. Asia and North America have comparatively larger crypto markets than the EU, with 263 million and 38 million users, respectively, compared to the EU's 31 million users.
  14. Regardless of the markets WLF evaluates, compliance with general stipulations concerning transparency, legal architecture, and real-time transaction oversight could be conducive to USD1's eventual success.
  15. In a dynamic world where technologies like crypto, DeFi, and stablecoins are shaping personal-finance, business, education-and-self-development, general-news, sports, weather, entertainment, and casino-and-gambling, it's crucial for stablecoins like USD1 to navigate the complex regulatory landscape with discernment and adaptability. A disclaimer: This text should not be taken as financial advice, and readers are encouraged to conduct thorough research before investing or making any decisions concerning cryptocurrencies.
USD1 stablecoin encounters hurdles relating to transparency, reserve backings, and volume limitations as it aims to enter the European market via MiCA, posing challenges in establishing credibility.
Stablecoin backed by USD1 faces hurdles such as transparency, collateral backing, and volume restrictions in securing entry into the European market through MiCA due to concerns about its legitimacy and integrity.

Read also:

    Latest