Skip to content

Gay Marriage Rights Denial by Supreme Court for LGBTQIA+ Individuals

Decision on same-sex marriage resulted in discontent among the LGBTQIA+ community, with a majority of three judges opposing it, while merely two supported it.

Same-sex marriage equality denied by the Supreme Court for the LGBTQIA+ populace
Same-sex marriage equality denied by the Supreme Court for the LGBTQIA+ populace

Gay Marriage Rights Denial by Supreme Court for LGBTQIA+ Individuals

On October 17, 2023, the Supreme Court of India delivered a verdict on the legal recognition of same-sex marriage. The case was heard by a five-judge Constitution bench, consisting of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justices SK Kaul, SR Bhat, Hima Kohli, and PS Narasimha.

The petitioners argued that LGBTQIA+ individuals deserved equal rights, including being recognized as spouses for financial and insurance matters, adoption, surrogacy, and more. However, the ruling saw three judges against recognizing same-sex marriage and only two in favor.

Justice Chandrachud acknowledged both agreement and disagreement on the extent to which same-sex marriages should be recognized. This viewpoint placed Justice Ravindra Bhat in opposition to the Chief Justice.

Justice Bhat expressed concerns about a gender-neutral interpretation of the Special Marriage Act, fearing that it might inadvertently expose women to vulnerabilities. Justices Hima Kohli and PS Narasimha share Justice Bhat's concerns about the right to marry being unequivocal.

The verdict has left a significant portion of the Indian population disheartened, with some expressing frustration at the lack of progress in the quest for equal marriage rights. The ruling underscores the ongoing struggle for the LGBTQIA+ community and their rights and recognition in India.

In response to the concerns raised, the Supreme Court has urged the Indian government to establish a high-powered committee to investigate the issues, rights, and benefits of queer couples. The future may hold further developments as the government addresses these concerns.

It is important to note that civil unions of queer couples do not have constitutional or fundamental rights in India. The broadcast of the verdict live for citizens across the nation highlights the complexity of the issue within Indian society regarding same-sex marriage.

The verdict comes at a time when the world is progressing in recognizing and upholding the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community. As the Indian government considers the Supreme Court's decision, it is hoped that a fair and equitable solution will be found to ensure equal rights for all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity.

Read also:

Latest