"Judge Decision: Involvement of another vehicle not essential for classification as an 'accident'; incidents such as overturning or slipping could also qualify."
In a recent ruling, the Bombay High Court has determined that the death of a woman, who perished while riding a motorcycle due to her saree becoming entangled, was an accidental death. The case, which has garnered attention, also saw the court enhance the compensation payable by the insurer and rule on various financial aspects related to the deceased's estate.
The woman, who was financially affluent, served as a Director of Roentgen Scan World Pvt. Ltd., receiving substantial dividends. Her husband contended that her disclosed assets were not a true reflection of her wealth, claiming she had regular independent income. However, the High Court found her explanation for property transfers unconvincing and held that she already had sufficient means to sustain herself.
The Court clarified that the term "accident" under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, includes collision, overturning, or slipping, regardless of the involvement of another vehicle. This ruling sets a precedent, emphasising that such incidents can be classified as accidents even if they do not involve a collision with another vehicle.
In addition to ruling on the cause of death, the High Court also addressed the financial matters of the deceased's estate. The Court increased the compensation to ₹8,32,800, marking a net increase of ₹7,82,800, with 7.5% interest. The insurer has been ordered to pay this amount within eight weeks.
Maintenance of ₹30,000 for the deceased's son and educational expenses remained unchallenged and are now payable. The High Court's decision serves as a reminder of the financial responsibilities that come with parenthood, even in the event of a tragic loss.
Separately, the Allahabad High Court made a significant ruling in a different case, stating that merely because a marriage has not been registered under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, it does not mean the marriage is invalid. This decision could potentially impact numerous unregistered marriages in India.
Lastly, the Supreme Court delivered a decision on August 28, 2025, in the case Partha Das & Ors. vs. The State of Tripura & Ors. The decision prohibited the cancellation of the recruitment process, a decision that is expected to have far-reaching implications for recruitment procedures in the country.
These rulings underscore the role of the judiciary in shaping society, addressing critical issues, and providing clarity on complex matters. As these cases continue to unfold, it is essential to maintain a clear understanding of the facts and the impact these rulings will have on various sectors of society.
Read also:
- Lu Shiow-yen's Challenging Position as Chair of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Under Scrutiny in Donovan's Analysis
- "Trump Criticizes EU's $3.5 billion fine on Google as Unjust, Threatens Additional Tariffs"
- Restructuring community adaptability amidst multiple concurrent crises
- Palmer engages in a dispute with AfD.
