Mental Health Balance: The Significance of Flexibility and Rigidness
In the realm of philosophy, both Western and Eastern thinkers have long pondered the effects of language on our lives. Greek philosophers delved into realism, while Eastern philosophies grappled with the issue of attachment. More recent philosophers, such as Hume, have also focused on this topic.
At the heart of this discussion lies the use of rigid language, which refers to statements that impose rules, expectations, and conditions. Such language results in the development of rules about how things are supposed to work and places unnecessary conditions on how people and things function. This rigidity can lead to over identification with behaviors, events, and situations, and in over generalized conclusions.
From a neurocognitive perspective, rigid language relates to our brains' innate tendency to develop simplistic heuristics for efficiency, but can lead to problems. When distanced from a challenging situation, a person may be able to express rigid beliefs calmly and accept specific failures. However, in close proximity to a failure, the rigid belief may become stronger and trigger emotional distress, such as depression.
In psychology, the concept has been discussed by psychologists like Horney, Ellis, Beck, and Hayes. The negative consequences of rigid language, such as "rule governance", have been shown in studies, relating to emotional distress and behavioral problems. Prominent psychologists such as Steven Pinker, Jordan Peterson, and Lisa Feldman Barrett have recently discussed the importance and consequences of strict language patterns in shaping problematic human behaviors and emotional functioning.
To reduce the use of rigid language, a variety of techniques have been shown to be effective. These interventions aim to increase functionality and mental flexibility by targeting rigid thought patterns. Techniques include behavioral interventions, cognitive restructuring, cognitive distancing techniques, and mindfulness strategies. Promoting the use of flexible/preferential language, such as "it would be better if..." or "I would like it...", allows for understanding and acceptance of influencing factors.
Understanding the underlying mechanisms at play is important in helping people develop a more flexible mindset. This is not just about avoiding emotional distress, but also about promoting objectivity and reducing attachment to specific ideas and cognitive biases. It is therefore inherently based on a logical fallacy.
Research studies, including those by Steven Hayes and his colleagues, and Daniel David and his colleagues, have supported these findings. The rigid and flexible versions of the same belief can co-exist within a person, with one being more activated depending on the context. Hence, they give rise to problematic evaluations that contribute to emotional distress.
In conclusion, the use of rigid language, including "shoulds", "expectations", "musts", "have to's", "needs", and "oughts", has a significant impact on our emotional wellbeing and behavior. By promoting the use of flexible language, we can foster a more accepting, objective, and adaptable mindset.
