NYC's election authorities face ambiguity over their power to veto questions related to housing on ballots.
In a surprising turn of events, the upcoming hearing on Tuesday by the Board of Elections in New York City is set to decide the fate of three ballot provisions that aim to change the city's charter. These proposals, if approved, would accelerate housing construction and break the influence individual councilmembers have over housing and land use decisions in their districts.
The proposals, drafted by a commission organised by Mayor Eric Adams, were intended to appear on the November general election ballot. However, they are facing opposition from City Council leaders who have asked the Board of Elections to block the measures.
The political turf war over New York City housing decisions has expanded to include the city's Board of Elections, an organisation typically focused on procedural roles in the city's elections. The Board is currently considering whether they have the authority to block the proposed measures, with good government groups and election experts divided on the issue.
Some argue that the Board of Elections would be acting outside its bounds if they block the proposed measures. Comptroller Brad Lander, who supports the ballot measures, views the potential block as "deeply corrupt and outrageous." On the other hand, others believe that the Board has the power to block the measures if they deem them to be in violation of the city charter or election laws.
The three ballot provisions would create a three-member panel that could approve projects rejected by the Council. They would also allow the city to fast-track some affordable housing construction. If passed, this would mark a significant shift in the way housing decisions are made in New York City.
The deadline for the Board of Elections to make their decision is later in the week. The outcome of this hearing could have far-reaching implications for the city's housing landscape and the role of the Board of Elections in the city's political process.
The measure is not sailing through the pro forma process this time, as it usually does, and the organisation that intends to reject the proposal to accelerate housing construction in New York City is not explicitly mentioned in the search results provided. Regardless, the city waits with bated breath for the Board of Elections' decision.
