Skip to content

Police apprehended three individuals following demonstrations in Epping, spurred by a court decision that prevented the closure of a migrant hotel.

Protests over asylum hotels led to three arrests and two injured police officers in Epping on Friday night.

Protesters rally at Epping amidst arrests of three individuals following a legal obstacle to the...
Protesters rally at Epping amidst arrests of three individuals following a legal obstacle to the shutdown of a migrant hotel.

Police apprehended three individuals following demonstrations in Epping, spurred by a court decision that prevented the closure of a migrant hotel.

In the Essex town of Epping, a protest over the use of asylum hotels took an unexpected turn on Friday night. The demonstration, which also saw protests in Cheshunt, Hertfordshire, resulted in several arrests, injuries to police officers, and the implementation of a dispersal order.

Three individuals were arrested during the protest, with one person held on suspicion of violent disorder. Another was arrested on suspicion of assaulting a police officer, and a third man was arrested on suspicion of drink driving after driving a car on the wrong side of the road towards a police cordon.

Assistant Chief Constable Glen Pavelin addressed the situation, stating, "While protest is a democratic right, the right to commit crime is not included." He continued to express his understanding of the strong feelings in Epping throughout the summer, urging protesters to voice their concerns safely and peacefully.

The protests followed the government's announcement that it had won its bid to block the closure of the Bell Hotel, a focal point of recent protests. However, a court decision authorised Somani Hotels, the owner of the Bell Hotel, to use the hotel for asylum seekers beyond the September 12 deadline. This decision was made following a legal request submitted by the Epping Forest District Council after residents protested due to crime and safety concerns linked to the asylum seekers housed there.

In response to the protests, Essex Police used additional powers to request that anyone assembling outside the hotel leave the area by 9.30pm on Friday, which was adhered to. A dispersal order was then put in place, effective until 6am on Saturday, August 30. Anyone suspected of committing, or being intent on committing, anti-social behaviour can be asked to leave the area by officers under the dispersal order. If someone does not leave the area under the dispersal order, they face being arrested.

Two police officers sustained injuries during the protest, but they are not serious. A second order was put in place with regard to a small crowd on the Epping side of High Road, which said they needed to leave the area by 10pm, and this was also followed.

The Home Office and Somani Hotels had been seeking to challenge this decision in a bid to avoid similar legal challenges across the country. However, following today's ruling, asylum seekers will now be allowed to stay in Epping's Bell Hotel beyond the previously given September 12 deadline. The Epping Forest District Council has been granted an interim injunction by the High Court, stopping the Bell Hotel's owner from using the hotel to accommodate asylum seekers beyond this date.

The situation in Epping serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding the housing of asylum seekers and the importance of maintaining peace and order during protests. As the situation continues to develop, it is essential that all parties involved respect the rule of law and work towards finding a solution that addresses the concerns of the local community while upholding the rights of asylum seekers.

Read also:

Latest