Practical Guide to Effective English Language Usage
In the digital age, the balance between security and individual rights is a pressing concern for many countries. This article explores the internet regulations in China, South Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam, focusing on the use of digital credentials and the real-name system.
China's internet landscape is unique, with a system that assigns users a unique code linked to their personal information without revealing their full identity. This code, known as the internet ID, serves as a digital credential, enabling users to verify their identity across various platforms. The country's internet real-name system requires citizens to connect their online activities to their real identities, a measure aimed at maintaining security and order.
However, critics argue that such systems can significantly restrict freedom of speech. This was evident in South Korea, where a real-name system was previously enforced but was abolished in 2012 following a major data leak and strong public opposition. The incident underscored the potential risks of personal information exposure, with privacy advocates warning of potential data abuse.
In contrast, Taiwan, as a free, democratic country, does not impose such regulations. This makes it essential to cherish and protect internet freedoms, ensuring that individuals can express themselves freely without fear of reprisal.
Meanwhile, Vietnam introduced Decree 147 in 2024, requiring users on Facebook and TikTok to verify their identities and limiting minors' gaming hours. This move reflects the government's commitment to maintaining online security, particularly for young users, while also raising questions about the balance between security and individual rights.
The internet ID system and network certificate in China, and the real-name system in South Korea and Vietnam, highlight the challenge of balancing security and individual rights in the digital age. As technology continues to evolve, it is crucial for governments and citizens alike to engage in open dialogue about these issues, ensuring that the internet remains a space for free expression and innovation.
Despite efforts to trace the origins, there are no search results identifying the name of the person who initiated the abolition of the internet real-name system in South Korea. This serves as a reminder that the balance between security and freedom is not a static state, but a dynamic process that requires continuous review and adjustment.
