Prominent figure overseeing security clearance overhaul resigns from post
The U.S. government is taking significant strides to improve identity security, focusing on updated digital identity guidelines, strengthening identity governance, and implementing a zero trust architecture strategy.
Recently, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released Revision 4 of its Digital Identity Guidelines (Special Publication 800-63), updating standards that date back to 2017. This revision incorporates emerging technologies like mobile driver’s licenses for online identity proofing and includes new controls to address threats such as deepfakes.
In the federal cybersecurity landscape, identity has become the new perimeter, especially as agencies adopt cloud computing, AI-driven tools, and hybrid work models. To address the challenges posed by fragmented identity tools and sophisticated AI-based attacks, agencies are developing integrated, adaptive identity architectures that continuously verify users and devices in real time.
The U.S. Department of Justice’s Data Security Program, effective since April 2025, enforces strict controls on covered data transactions involving sensitive personal data, including biometric and government ID information. This measure complements identity security efforts by restricting data access to foreign adversaries, thereby reducing risks of identity-based threats.
In a move to bolster the Pentagon’s cyber posture and artificial intelligence capabilities, the Senate Armed Services Committee's 2026 defense policy bill includes provisions to this effect. The Defense Department's Chief Data and Artificial Intelligence Office has also selected four vendors - Anthropic, Google, OpenAI, and xAI - to provide advanced AI tools. Under four separate contracts each with a $200 million ceiling, the services and defense agencies can award task orders to these vendors to develop agentic AI workflows across a variety of mission areas.
However, the journey towards improved identity security is not without its challenges. The Department of Veterans Affairs is shrinking its IT workforce and repurposing a portion of its technology budget. Additionally, the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Defense Department have increased the use of health care sharing agreements over the years, but long-standing implementation challenges persist.
In other developments, the Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to lay off about 1,400 Department of Education employees, and many employees who received layoff notices from the Department of Health and Human Services have now officially separated from the agency. David Cattler, the director of the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency, is retiring on Sept. 30 after more than 35 years of federal service. Before he retires, Cattler will complete a major reorganization of the agency, which will help further reduce the backlog of security clearances.
As of May, the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) said it has decreased the backlog by 17% in 2025 alone. A Rockville, Maryland IT contractor has agreed to pay almost 15 million dollars to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by overbilling for cybersecurity services.
These initiatives form a comprehensive strategy aligning with zero trust principles to improve identity security within government environments. While progress is being made, ongoing debates and implementation hurdles indicate that the journey towards secure digital identities continues.
[1] Source: [Link to the original source 1] [2] Source: [Link to the original source 2] [3] Source: [Link to the original source 3] [4] Source: [Link to the original source 4] [5] Source: [Link to the original source 5]
- As the U.S. government continues to focus on identity security, discussions surrounding war-and-conflicts and policy-and-legislation have emerged in relation to the Data Security Program's restrictions on data access to foreign adversaries, aiming to reduce risks of identity-based threats.
- Meanwhile, in a stark contrast, the gambling industry, such as casino-and-gambling and casino-games, faces scrutiny with the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into illegal sports betting and money laundering in casinos, highlighting crime-and-justice concerns.
- General news outlets and political pundits have been abuzz with debates about poker's place within casino-games and overall casino-and-gambling policy-and-legislation, raising questions about the role of politics in the gambling industry.
- In a shocking instance of identity-related crime-and-justice, a deepfake involving a high-ranking official was attempted, emphasizing the need for updated digital identity guidelines as part of the war-and-conflicts against cyber threats.