Skip to content

Trump Allegedly Dismisses Chief of United States Copyright Office

AI industry's usage of copyrighted content raises concerns for Shira Perlmutter.

Trump reportedly dismisses head of the US Copyright Office
Trump reportedly dismisses head of the US Copyright Office

=================================================================================================

The debate over artificial intelligence (AI) using copyrighted material has taken a new turn, with the U.S. Copyright Office issuing a report that challenges industry assumptions and raises concerns about potential harm to artists, creators, and copyright holders.

The report, published earlier this year, concludes that many current AI training practices likely do not qualify as fair use, emphasizing that ingesting entire copyrighted works without permission is prima facie infringement absent a legal exception. This stance has sparked significant reactions within the government and industry.

One of the key figures at the centre of this controversy is Shira Perlmutter, the former Register of Copyrights who was fired from her position earlier this week. The U.S. Copyright Office, a department of the Library of Congress, issued the report under her leadership.

The report's stance on AI and copyright has been linked to Perlmutter's dismissal, an event widely viewed as politically motivated. Democratic Congressperson Joe Morelle of New York, the ranking member of the Committee on House Administration, has questioned the motivations behind Perlmutter's firing, describing it as a "brazen, unprecedented power grab with no legal basis."

The report's findings have also had implications for Carla Hayden, the Librarian of Congress, who was also fired without explanation earlier this week. Hayden, who served during both Barack Obama's first term and the first Trump presidency without disruption, made significant efforts to modernize and optimize the library's systems during her tenure.

The American Accountability Foundation, a right-wing organization, took aim at Hayden for denouncing efforts to remove books about sexual identity from libraries and inviting Lizzo to play a crystal flute at a concert in 2022. The foundation also scrutinized Perlmutter for donations to Democratic political campaigns.

The report's publication comes amidst growing support among tech CEOs for removing intellectual property laws to mine and utilize as much data as possible to train their AI models. Elon Musk, for instance, recently endorsed the idea of removing all intellectual property laws.

However, the use of copyrighted works to train commercial services "goes beyond established fair use boundaries," according to the report from Perlmutter's office. This view is shared by Joe Morelle, who made a statement after Perlmutter refused to rubber-stamp Elon Musk's efforts to mine troves of copyrighted works to train AI models.

The ongoing debate remains highly contentious and fluid. Courts are issuing mixed rulings, the Copyright Office has taken a stricter position on fair use for AI training, and political developments reflect the high stakes and contentious nature of this policy area. Most experts anticipate that ultimate resolution will require legislative or Supreme Court action to clarify AI’s relationship with copyright and fairly balance innovation with creators’ rights.

[1] Bartz v. Anthropic [2] Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence [3] CNN [4] The Verge [5] Ars Technica

  1. The future of tech and technology could be significantly impacted by the ongoing debate on AI using copyrighted material, as the U.S. Copyright Office has challenged industry assumptions and raised concerns about potential harm to artists and creators.
  2. Recent political events, such as the dismissal of Shira Perlmutter, former Register of Copyrights, and the Librarian of Congress, Carla Hayden, have fueled accusations of political motivation and questionable actions.
  3. According to reports published by Gizmodo and other general news outlets, the American Accountability Foundation, a right-wing organization, has criticized both Perlmutter and Hayden for their stances on issues like the removal of books about sexual identity from libraries and political donations.
  4. The war-and-conflicts and crime-and-justice sectors might also be affected by this debate, as the misuse of intellectual property could lead to exploitation and unethical practices in these fields.
  5. The report from Perlmutter's office has stated that the use of copyrighted works to train commercial services goes beyond established fair use boundaries, a view that is shared by Democratic Congressperson Joe Morelle.
  6. In the world of sports and sports-betting, AI could potentially revolutionize the industry by predicting outcomes more accurately, but the implications of using copyrighted materials in this context remain unclear.
  7. As the debate progresses, policy-and-legislation and politics will play crucial roles in shaping the future of AI, technology, and copyright policy, with court rulings, legislative action, and Supreme Court decisions likely to be key factors.

Read also:

    Latest