Skip to content

U.S. Policy Institute Issues Caution to Trump Administration Regarding Handling of India Similar to Japan and EU

U.S. implementation of tariffs on India provokes strain, as specialists counsel caution from Trump administration regarding India's distinctive economic and strategic objectives, advocating a change in strategy to prevent additional diplomatic controversy.

U.S. Policy Analysts Warn Trump Administration Against Approaching India Like Japan and the EU in...
U.S. Policy Analysts Warn Trump Administration Against Approaching India Like Japan and the EU in Negotiations

U.S. Policy Institute Issues Caution to Trump Administration Regarding Handling of India Similar to Japan and EU

In recent times, the relationship between the United States and India, once seen as a cornerstone of America's Indo-Pacific strategy, has been strained. This shift is not a result of a single diplomatic misstep, but a series of actions that reflect a lack of understanding on both sides.

The rising tensions have raised concerns about the future of the bilateral relationship. One of the key issues at hand is the U.S.'s ability to maintain its influence in Asia and secure access to critical resources. If India shifts its focus towards certain countries, it could challenge this influence.

The Atlantic Council, a prominent think tank, has suggested that the United States must adopt a more balanced and nuanced approach towards India. They argue that the lack of consistency in U.S. policy undermined its relationship with India and its broader strategy.

One of the points of contention between the two nations is trade. The U.S. imposed a 50% tariff on goods imported from India, a move that was met with retaliation. In response, President Donald Trump targeted India's energy trade, particularly its dealings with Russia. However, the Atlantic Council recommends lifting tariffs on India for purchasing Russian oil, as India is adhering to the G7's price cap.

India's reliance on Russian oil remains critical to its industrial needs. Despite this, India did not credit President Trump for helping ease tensions between India and Pakistan, which led to anger in Washington.

The relationship between the two countries had been strengthened in the past by their shared goal of countering China's growing influence in the region. They had worked closely in strategic groupings such as the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad), which includes the United States, India, Japan, and Australia.

The Atlantic Council also suggests re-engaging in trade discussions with India through a new U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue. They propose reviving the U.S.-India CEO Forum to allow business leaders from both countries to collaborate and strengthen their ties.

The escalating tensions could potentially push India closer to China, Russia, and the BRICS nations. A strong and enduring relationship between the U.S. and India can only be built on mutual respect and long-term shared interests, according to the Atlantic Council.

As political leaders from both nations discuss leading the U.S.-India Strategic Dialogue, it remains to be seen how the relationship between the two countries will evolve in the future.

Read also:

Latest