Unveiling a fresh character trait: 'Otrovert': Adding another layer of complexity to human persona understanding
In the realm of psychology, the year 1952 marked a significant shift with the birth of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which took a more scientific approach than its predecessors. Fast forward to 2021, and a new term, "Otrovert," entered the psychological lexicon. This term was not coined by a social media influencer, but by Dr. Rami Kaminski, a New York psychiatrist, to describe people who are averse to communing with groups.
The concept of the Otrovert contrasts with the enduring twelve sun signs of astrology, which were given around the same period in the fifth century BCE by Hippocrates. He introduced the four temperaments - sanguine, choleric, melancholic, and phlegmatic - as a way to categorise human personalities.
Jung, a renowned psychologist, argued that exploring less developed capacities is beneficial for personal growth. This idea resonates with the characteristics of Otroverts, who are often original thinkers, valuing deep connections and preferring authenticity over conformity.
However, it's important to note that psychotherapists advise holding diagnostic labels or personality types lightly. Viewing them as aspects of oneself, not the whole thing, is a healthier approach. Identifying too strongly with a label can limit self-perception and potential actions.
Over the years, the DSM has evolved, with the DSM-5 arriving in 2013. This version substantially decreased the number of conditions but also significantly broadened its criteria. This expansion over the next thirty years, from 106 diagnoses to nearly 300, has raised concerns about the medicalisation of everyday experiences.
In today's digital age, platforms like TikTok have become a source of mental health information. However, over 80% of this information is misleading, with Millennials and Gen Zs often self-diagnosing based on simplified and often misleading information. This trend can be concerning, as it may lead to a misunderstanding of one's mental health and potential treatment.
Despite the rise of identity categories such as introvert and extravert, it's essential to remember that these terms were not intended to define a person's identity. The author, Aaron, for instance, acknowledges that he may be an Otrovert and a Taurus, but he emphasises that he is none of these labels. He considers himself to be Aaron, which he considers to be more than enough.
In conclusion, the emergence of the Otrovert offers a new perspective in the field of psychology, encouraging individuals to explore their unique qualities and to value authenticity over conformity. However, it's crucial to approach these labels with a sense of caution, viewing them as aspects of oneself, not the whole thing.
